Skip to main content
Back to overview
High

Kodak Confirms Data Breach After ShinyHunters Extortion Threat

24 billion stolen records exposed online.

Key points

  • ShinyHunters extortion group claimed responsibility for the breach.
  • Over 2.2 million records, including customer PII and internal corporate data, allegedly stolen.
  • ShinyHunters set a deadline of June 18, 2026, for data publication.

Connected intelligence

Signal brief

Follow the organization, likely method and potential impact to explore connected Shadow Tier intelligence.

02

Likely method

Phishing Social Engineering

Malware, Social, Error activity

03

Potential impact

Data Exposure

Confidentiality

Published
Jun 18, 2026
Updated
Jul 22, 2026
Confidence
High
Evidence
14 sources

Structured assessment

Signal analysis

This analysis groups the signal by industry, likely incident action and impacted security area. It helps compare this signal with other published signals without treating the labels as final determinations.

Threat source

Malware, Social, Error activity

Watch phishing, executive impersonation and account-takeover exposure.

  • Source type: supplier or third-party involvement

Business impact

Potential fraud or account takeover risk
Impact area
Confidentiality
Likely asset
User or customer data, Server or cloud data store

Mentioned entities

KodakData DisclosureShinyHunters Extortion ThreatHereWhileResearchersCybernewsTelegramBecause theSome

Quick context

Questions about this signal

What happened in this signal?

24 billion stolen records exposed online. Here’s what to do A newly discovered database containing 24 billion stolen records is a reminder that personal information from data breaches, phishing campaigns, and infostealer infections continues to circulate online. The collection was exposed on the internet before being taken offline. While researchers can’t confirm exactly whose information was included, the discovery is a good opportunity to check whether your email addresses, passwords, or other personal data have already been exposed. Researchers at Cybernews found a publicly exposed database holding more than 8.3 TB of data. The data, consisting of 24 billion credential records, reportedly came from 36 sources, including numerous Telegram channels, prior breach compilations, collections of infostealer logs, and some datasets apparently exported directly from live servers. Because the data came from different sources there are some differences in what the records contain and how they are organized. Some records were structured infostealer logs containing usernames, email addresses, and plaintext passwords, and the associated login URL. Infostealers are a type of malware designed to steal sensitive information from infected devices, such as your home computer. An infostealer log from a single infected device can include passwords stored across all browsers, active session cookies and tokens (including those that bypass multi-factor authentication), autofill data, device fingerprints, and sometimes crypto wallets or messaging accounts. The complete bundle is what ends up in logs such as those seen by the Cybernews researchers. Roughly 1.7 billion of the records came from hacking-related Telegram channels, mainly English and Russian, including at least one that was focused on stolen credit card data. The exposed database was hosted on an Elasticsearch cluster. Elasticsearch is a tool used to quickly store and search lots of data. If an Elasticsearch server lacks passwords,  authentication , or network restrictions, it can be accessed by anyone who finds it online. Without protections such as passwords or a firewall, anyone can read, copy, change, or even delete its data. Other documents in the dataset contained information about known vulnerabilities, articles about breaches, and social media posts about cyberattacks. This suggests the owner actively monitors security news and vulnerabilities and enriches the credential hoard with fresh breach information, either for a commercial “monitoring” service or for offensive use. A few years ago, we wrote about what was called the “mother of all breaches,” where the source of the dataset was later identified as data breach search engine Leak-Lookup. This newly discovered 24 billion record exposure is in the same league as that previous mega‑dump, but appears more heavily weighted toward fresh infostealer logs, rather than older, static breach data. Since the data was taken out of public view soon after the discovery, the researchers were unable to fully retrace everything they had found or determine how many duplicate records it contained. That’s reassuring because it reduces the chances of cybercriminals finding the database, but reused passwords may still put accounts at risk. And we still don’t know the purpose for the data collection in the first place. It’s good to be aware of how much information about you is out there and who’s gathering it, but it’s even more important to know exactly which information they have, since that is what they can use against you. 1. Check if your data has been exposed online using our Digital Footprint Portal . 2. If you discover exposed passwords, change them immediately and make sure you aren’t reusing the same password across multiple accounts. Prioritize updating your important accounts such as email, banking, shopping, and social media accounts. 3. Turn on multi-factor authentication (MFA) wherever possible, since it can help protect accounts even if a password has been exposed. Infostealers often spread through malicious ads, fake browser updates, and one-click downloads. Avoid clicking sponsored ads, and instead visit official websites directly. Download software only from trusted sources such as official vendor sites or app stores. Another increasingly popular technique is  ClickFix , a social engineering attack that tricks users into infecting their own devices. Never run commands or scripts copied from websites, emails, or messages unless you trust the source and understand what they do. Pirated software, game cheats, cracked tools, and shady browser extensions remain common sources of infostealer infections. Stick to reputable software and extensions, and be wary of anything asking for excessive permissions. Lastly, phishing emails are still a major threat. Be cautious of unexpected attachments, links, and urgent requests. If you’re unsure whether a message is legitimate, verify it through the company’s official website rather than the link in the message. You can also use Malwarebytes Scam Guard to check individual messages. Just upload a screenshot and we’ll let you know if it’s a scam. Breaches happen every day. Don’t be the last to know. President Gives China Gift Towards AI Leadership CISA Issues BOD on Patching Because, Apparently, Agencies Don’t Patch Is Your AI Infrastructure Ready for AI in Production? Claude Fable 5 – their most powerful model ever released to the public Are AI agents the new weakest link in the security chain? Our MSP has one userid that they share across their techs. Is this okay? Cyber Insurance Rates Down, but so is Coverage Is this the new norm thanks to AI? Microsoft releases over 200 patches this week Oracle Warns of Bug That Hackers Used to Breach Over 100 Companies OOPSIE. Japanese Energy Firm LOSES Drive with 10.9 Million Client’s Data Prez says he is considering “investing” in AI companies People becoming more thoughtful about AI UK tells big tech to block nudes – in 3 months Security News for the week ending June 12, 2026 – EU turns to Russian alternative to Microsoft Office, former twitter engineer who warned about Grok’s safety was fired and is now suing, Senate votes to not create new Pentagon branch, Cyber Force, feds shut down a couple of deep fake porn sites – call it groundbreaking and FISA section 702 lapses (lapsed) at Midnight (Friday).

When was this signal reported?

Shadow Tier lists Jun 18, 2026 as the signal date.

Which organization is connected to this signal?

Kodak is the organization connected to this public signal.

Explore Kodak
Which attack pattern is relevant?

This signal is connected to phishing and social-engineering intelligence based on its reported incident context.

Explore phishing and social-engineering intelligence
Which impact area is relevant?

This signal is connected to data exposure and breach intelligence based on its reported consequences.

Explore data exposure and breach intelligence