Skip to main content

Company intelligence

Cock cybersecurity incidents and threat signals

cock.li

Cock logo

This company page brings together public reporting currently associated with Cock. It reflects signals published by Shadow Tier and should not be read as a complete incident history.

1

Published signals

currently linked to this company

0

Last 28 days

recent published signals

0

Last 90 days

recent published signals

0

High or critical

confidence classifications

July 22, 2026

Latest report

most recent published signal

Explore related intelligence

Explore this reporting from another angle

Based on all published signals currently linked to Cock. Affected countries come from victim data; the company country above remains a separate profile fact. Counts describe this reporting set, not overall incident prevalence.

Company signals

All published signals involving Cock

Cock logoRansomware
Medium

Hacker steals 1 million Cock.li user records in webmail data breach

Hacker steals 1 million Cock.li user records in webmail data breach Email hosting provider Cock.li has confirmed it suffered a data breach after threat actors exploited flaws in its now-retired Roundcube webmail platform to steal over a million user records. The incident exposed all users who had logged in to the mail service since 2016, estimated at 1,023,800 people, along with contact entries for an additional 93,000 users. Cock.li is a Germany-based free email hosting provider with a privacy-focused ethos and lax moderation policies, run by a single operator known as 'Vincent Canfield' since 2013. It is promoted as an alternative to mainstream email providers, supporting standard security protocols like SMTP, IMAP, and TLS. Cock.li is used by people who distrust major providers and members of infosec and open-source communities. It is also popular among cybercriminals, such as affiliates from Dharma, Phobos, and other ransomware gangs. Late last week, the Cock.li service was disrupted without public explanation, leaving users wondering what might have happened. Soon after, a threat actor claimed to be selling two databases containing dumped from Cock.li that contained sensitive user information, offering them for sale for a minimum of one Bitcoin ($92.5k). Cock.li published a statement on its website yesterday, confirming the breach and the validity of the threat actor's claims. The email service confirmed that the following information has been exposed for 1,023,800 user accounts: A serialized blob of Roundcube settings and email signature Contact names (only for a subset of 10,400 accounts) Contact email addresses (only for a subset of 10,400 accounts) vCards (only for a subset of 10,400 accounts) Comments (only for a subset of 10,400 accounts) The service's announcement clarifies that user account passwords, email content, and IP addresses were not compromised, as these are not present in the stolen databases. Meanwhile, the 10,400 account holders who had third-party contact information exposed will be getting a separate notification. For everyone who used the service since 2016, it is recommended to reset their account passwords. The Cock.li data breach could be valuable to researchers and law enforcement, as the exposed information can be used to learn more about the threat actors who use the platform. Cock.li says they believe the data was stolen using an old RoundCube SQL injection vulnerability tracked as CVE-2021-44026. This breach comes just as Cock.li recently analyzed an RCE flaw in Roundcube, CVE-2025-49113, which is believed to be actively exploited in attacks . Their analysis led them to remove the software from their platform in June 2025. "Cock.li will no longer be offering Roundcube webmail," explained the service admins. "Regardless of whether our version was vulnerable to this, we've learned enough about Roundcube to pull it from the service for good." "Another webmail is definitely on the table, but it is not an immediate priority for us."

Cock

FAQ

Questions about Cock cybersecurity reporting

What does the Cock page include?

It combines a reviewed organization profile with all current published Shadow Tier signals explicitly linked to Cock.

Does every mention of Cock appear here?

No. A signal must contain a reliable company connection and meet the publication criteria; incidental or ambiguous mentions are excluded.

Why can the incident count change?

The page follows current published reporting. Counts change as new evidence is added, classifications are reviewed, or older signals leave the reporting window.