Skip to main content

Company intelligence

Gargle cybersecurity incidents and threat signals

gargle.com

Gargle logo

This company page brings together public reporting currently associated with Gargle. It reflects signals published by Shadow Tier and should not be read as a complete incident history.

1

Published signals

currently linked to this company

0

Last 28 days

recent published signals

0

Last 90 days

recent published signals

0

High or critical

confidence classifications

August 5, 2026

Latest report

most recent published signal

Explore related intelligence

Explore this reporting from another angle

Based on all published signals currently linked to Gargle. Affected countries come from victim data; the company country above remains a separate profile fact. Counts describe this reporting set, not overall incident prevalence.

Company signals

All published signals involving Gargle

Gargle logoMisconfiguration or publishing error
Medium

Huge Breach at Gargle Affects Millions of Dental Patients

A data leak exposed 2.7 million patient profiles and 8.8 million appointment records due to a misconfigured MongoDB database. Researchers at Cybernews discovered the publicly accessible database on March 26, 2025. The exposed data included individuals' names, dates of birth, email addresses, postal addresses, phone numbers, gender, chart IDs, language preferences, billing details, and appointment records. Gargle, a Utah-based company providing services for dental practices, is believed to be the entity whose data was exposed.

Gargle

FAQ

Questions about Gargle cybersecurity reporting

What does the Gargle page include?

It combines a reviewed organization profile with all current published Shadow Tier signals explicitly linked to Gargle.

Does every mention of Gargle appear here?

No. A signal must contain a reliable company connection and meet the publication criteria; incidental or ambiguous mentions are excluded.

Why can the incident count change?

The page follows current published reporting. Counts change as new evidence is added, classifications are reviewed, or older signals leave the reporting window.