1
Published signals
currently linked to this company
Company intelligence
Splitvpn cybersecurity incidents and threat signals
splitvpn.com
This company page brings together public reporting currently associated with Splitvpn. It reflects signals published by Shadow Tier and should not be read as a complete incident history.
Company links
0
Last 28 days
recent published signals
0
Last 90 days
recent published signals
1
High or critical
confidence classifications
August 6, 2026
Latest report
most recent published signal
Explore related intelligence
Explore this reporting from another angle
Based on all published signals currently linked to Splitvpn. Affected countries come from victim data; the company country above remains a separate profile fact. Counts describe this reporting set, not overall incident prevalence.
Confirmed impacts
Company signals
All published signals involving Splitvpn
SplitVPN Leaks Personal Data of 865,000 Users
VPN provider SplitVPN, previously known as NotVPN, has suffered a data leak exposing the personal data of 865,000 users. The compromised information, recently obtained and now circulating online, includes email addresses, device data, geographical locations, IP addresses, and partial credit card details (first six and last four digits, plus expiration date). Additionally, 58 million proxy logs, containing user IDs, IP addresses of used proxy servers, and visited locations, were exfiltrated. SplitVPN, a Russian VPN provider, had claimed to not store user activity or connection logs. The method of data theft has not been disclosed. The affected email addresses have been added to the Have I Been Pwned data breach search engine. It was noted that 37 percent of the stolen email addresses had already been compromised in previous data leaks.
FAQ
Questions about Splitvpn cybersecurity reporting
What does the Splitvpn page include?
It combines a reviewed organization profile with all current published Shadow Tier signals explicitly linked to Splitvpn.
Does every mention of Splitvpn appear here?
No. A signal must contain a reliable company connection and meet the publication criteria; incidental or ambiguous mentions are excluded.
Why can the incident count change?
The page follows current published reporting. Counts change as new evidence is added, classifications are reviewed, or older signals leave the reporting window.